Re: Compass Software

["Robertm" <Respond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In my view the problem began with professionals trying to bait a DIY by
telling the OP that he was welcome to go to that web site and they even said
it was free, all the while knowing that the site was password protected and
knowing it isn't free. I would think a professional response would have been
to tell the OP that it is professional software and limited to use by
professionals. But no, the pro's like to toy with DIY. For what purpose? Are
DIY really that much of a threat to the industry that professionals must be
put aside sound business practices to play games with people? What goes
around comes around. These things only provoke someone else to post the
password even if it may be wrong to do so.

Bob

"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:22S0f.11$k%1.151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Why? Because it's for alarm professional who understand the language and
> know what programming changes can do. Personally, I think it's
> irresponsible
> for someone to post un/pw for any alarm software that is meant for trained
> personnel.
>
>
>
> "Robertm" <Respond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:di0j0g$9574$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | "moe" <moe@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:YTP0f.1565$X8.1012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > that should be reported to ADI or the appropriate  authorities.
> | >
> | It can't be that much of a secret. I've looked into monitoring companies
> and
> | so far, two companies offered to give me the software for free if I sign
> up
> | with them. I'm a DIY not an alarm professional and from where I sit, it
> | looks like Ademco treats it like freeware. The UN/PW has been posted
> many
> | times so I'm assuming Honeywell either winks and looks the other way or
> else
> | condones it outright. I can't see their not being aware.
> |
> | Bob
> |
> |
> |
>
>