[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sprinkler Monitoring



I don't believe there is any grandfathering when an AHJ wants something. A
sprinkled building usually falls under central station service as required,
but than again I just ran across one last week that had a system but not
connected to any flows. The new owner had the local AHJ in for an inspection
before he bought the building and got a clean bill of health, but it is not
up to code on several issues. Go figure. In Florida, you do not need an
engineer stamp on anything under $5,000. Have the sprinkler company add the
flow and tamper. You are only adding a couple of modules or connecting a
couple of wires, which ever the case, and programming them in. Shouldn't be
over 5 grand if the same rules apply. I would have the fire department put
the time frame in writing, do the work, and apply for the permit as, work in
progress under instructions from the fire department. Let one city
department work it out with the other city department if they have a problem
with it.

"Bob La Londe" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:IoudnSYKIsRkO-XeRVn-vg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Old exisitng building has sprinkelrs, but no sprinkler monitoring.  They
had
> a fire, and the sprinklers did their job.
>
> Fire department came to inspect the dameg and told them they have 7 days
to
> get their sprinklers monitored.
>
> I'm pretty sure it is grandfathered as not requiring them to be monitored,
> but all that beig said, how do you get an electrical enginer to rubber
stamp
> a set of plans and pull a permit and get it installed all in seven (7)
days?
>
>
> --
> Bob La Londe
> http://www.YumaBassMan.com
>
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home