[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: NX-540 Networx Operator vs. RJ31X



tinyelvis77@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Does the NX-540 eliminate the need for an RJ31X on a Caddx NX8 panel?
>
> The wiring diagram for the NX-540 shows it directly between the panel
> and the telephones with no RJ31X involved, so I figure it must assume
> the role of the RJ31X.
>
> Is this right?

Wrong.

Not that it wont operate that way, but it doesn't provide any option to
disconnect the alarm system from the phone lines in the event there is
a suspicion that the alarm is causing a problem with the phone lines.
Phone company service are usually not even aware of what an RJ 31 X
jack does and will usually disconnect the alarm system anyway by
cutting the wires, but at least the owner can eliminate the alarm
system when the phone service guy automatically assumes and tells the
owner it's the alarm that's causing problems with the phone.



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home