Re: 17. New Readers, What does upset Pro's???

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

boring



<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:nola919rbg6v4p30st1rmeptlvsv1o70bm@xxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> What does upset Pro's in this news group when i say that wireless
> alarm systems are unreliable during Radio Frequency Interferences
> (RFI) ?
>=20
> Well look at theyre childish answers (instead of providing
> professional arguments) they try to ridicule, mono-bit/mono-lingual
> persons language battle, they tell you everything, the most stupid
> first, ..
>  Usual "low level electrician behavior" who think they have to battle
> to defend theyre position.
> Look around when you are in the industry, fighting is a typical
> attitude of the "lower education class persons".
>=20
> WHERE are MANUFACTURERS COUNTER ARGUMENTS to my statement that RFI
> muzzle the receivers of theyre receiver concept contained in theyre
> wireless alarm systems.
> Why do manufacturers not provide data about the main difference
> between wired and wireless: the wireless data about the loop between
> sensors and the control panel ?
> Because it can't be resolved in the actual FCC allowed SHARED
> FREQUENCIES who oblige them to use those.
> Space is crowded with other users, limited in band with, used free
> without interference warranty....
>=20
> Now the pro's tend to let you  believe that there is a RFI detection
> circuit, its in fact a sensor malfunction control and it don't resolve
> the RFI problem.
> Well it don't, the receiver is still muzzled and the alarm system
> don't provide any valid output data to tell that an intruder is
> present and detected.
>=20
> Its now since 4 years that I first mentioned that:
> -  Wireless Alarm Systems are UNRELIABLE during
>     Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI);
> -  Theyre is no warning that the system is muzzled to dead.
>=20
> Finally "so called" Pro's come to the conclusion:
> 1. RFI exist, interfere and can't be avoided;
> 2. There is a RFI detection circuit in the "modern" wireless
>    alarm systems (???);
> 3. The wireless alarm systems are working fine, no RFI detected
>    since 20+ years and 100000+ systems;
> 4. They have no RFI reliability measurement tools except theyre
>    on site experience;
> 5. There is no manufacturer support about that RFI subject.
>=20
> Even if a "unsupported by manufacturers" RFI detection exist(?) its
> strange that they have NO RFI alert/warnings.
>=20
> How is it possible that they are so Unprofessional. Why do they not
> call the manufacturers to support the wireless equipment RFI weak
> point?
>=20
> Paul