Re: 11. Pro's "THINK", yes they do but is it reasonable?

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

So, by your "logic" a pro should stand there with a wet finger in the =
air waiting for RFI to happen? And..after waiting forever..then what?

Sheesh what a maroon  you are.


<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:ljvn71p3c13k525c6flapslbg7uc4nh25h@xxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> Some low level pro's "think" there is nothing wrong with they're
> wireless alarm system installation... for years... experience... NO
> WARNING and in theyre mind RFI is detected.
>=20
>  Are they're systems still operational or just dead?
>=20
> When a Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) occurs, the system is no
> longer able to detected FIRE and/or INTRUSION, worse, and THE OWNER
> DOESN'T KNOW IT!!!!! The system is just "DEAD" and very quite.
>=20
> When i used a commercial available certified wireless radio headphone
> (sold all around in several places by thousands) it muzzled my
> wireless alarm system, it was "DEAF" for incoming signals (ID
> included) and "DEAD" on warning, that simple, that easy.
>  NOTE:
>      Its not typical to that wireless headphone, ANY transmitter
>        operating on the wireless alarm frequency will do.
>=20
>  Many other devices operate on the LPD (SRD) frequency simultaneously
> with the Wireless Alarm Systems, the frequency is "SHARED" and "NOT
> LAW PROTECTED" (FCC or similar) against Radio Frequency Interference
> (RFI)".
>=20
>  Some 900 MHz wireless alarm systems (only a few) have sensor
> transmission monitoring, this is intended to detect sensor
> malfunctions, obstacles or conductive objects displaced (a car
> displaced a few inches for instance) and located in the RF propagation
> paths who may inhibit reception of the signals emanating from the
> sensors. When it causes a data communication loss, it warns "after
> hours".
>  No reason to warn that your car has jeopardized the alarm sensor
> connection immediately, next day the car will be in another
> position...
>  Some installers remove this feature in order to avoid "false alarms"
> (and they don't tell it to you).
>  I have been told that this monitoring "may" detect RFI after hours of
> a "permanent" disturbing transmissions too???
>=20
> Pro's have NO test equipment, besides they're wet finger fake, to
> confirm that RFI is detected, they're past experience of no alarm is
> enough to proof reliability..
>=20
> All that makes PRO's THINK there is nothing wrong with "they're"
> installed wireless alarm systems.. They have sold / installed so
> many..
>=20
> For years CS stations have not detected any RFI (20+ years) they
> claim..=20
> But maybe you live in a transmitter free clean country not indicated
> on a map?
>=20
> Maybe the day your wireless alarm system was installed there was no
> disturbing transmission in the vicinity, but, the day there is RFI one
> and those so-called pro's imaginative RFI detection circuit exist..
> When there are several wireless alarm systems with sensor signal
> monitoring on in the vicinity... police... suburb nightmares.. let the
> show goes on when several systems are installed in you vicinity..
>=20
> In the mean time feel happy you have a quite system maybe still in
> good operational conditions:
>=20
>        NO WARNING isn't that a good sign of reliability???
>      Go on and think your installed system is in good shape; think.
>=20
> I had a quite system for at least one year due to RFI, nice isn't it?
>=20
> Paul
>