Re: cleaner wiring solution needed (resend)

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p6WdnePdRNNift7fRVn-pA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > I would normally agree with you however what would you really think
living
> > next door to a guy who decided to paint his house purple, never mow the
> yard
> > and have 3 cars on blocks in the front yard?
>
> I wouldn't give two shits about it. Nor would I be pressing that locally
> they pass a law banning purple houses. If he stopped paying taxes like me,
> I'd care...but I'd probably have no knowledge of it. Just because
somethings
> offend others, it doesn't give anyone the right to prejudge a person, or
> their desired way of life.

You wouldn't until his house begins devaluating your property which is the
main reason rules like that exist

> It just amazes me that the press would be
> reverse. Why doesn't the neighborhood pass a law requiring that the have's
> pay for the appearence that the havenot's can't achieve? Why? Because then
> it would effect the have's way of life. But the have's are just as stupid
> sometimes as the havenot's they try to regulate. They're called tax
> increases to regulate and enforce all these silly laws that offend the few
> have's. It's about like saying the havenot's should pass laws disallowing
> BMW's to be parked in the same neighborhood because it offends the rest of
> the havenot's. We call that racism where I'm from.

Welcome to the liberal northeast

> > Some laws are stupid but some I can understand
> >
> I'm thinking our forefathers probably figured laws would present a better
> way of life for us, or the citizens in general. I doubt seriously when
they
> gathered in convention to draft the document that defines our rights to
> freedom, they were concerned with all the rights you shouldn't have.
> If they did....nobody would have anything to bitch about, and we'd all
have
> purple houses.
> ;-)

I'm sure our founding fathers made their own share of stupid laws too :)