Re: Anybody else had dealings with Jim Rojas ??

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

How would I know?

I usually dump the thread when you guys start off on your =
tangents...unless they're funny I don't read them.



"Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:0E_oe.60490$lQ3.14247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> And what bogus info did "pinkie" post on me?
> I sure would like to know.
>=20
> Norm Mugford
>=20
>=20
>=20
> "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:9G_oe.17$ce4.725@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Your opinions are your opinions and if  you want to post them go =
ahead, but
> posting someone's address, phone number, and other personal =
information
> without their permission welll...that's kinda another issue.
>=20
>=20
> And this is just my opinion...I don't give a shit about the RLB vs. =
Whomever
> fight.
>=20
>=20
> "no wires showing" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1118071153.213787.31410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Crash Gordon=AE   Jun 5, 2:26 am     show options
>=20
> Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
> From: Crash Gordon=AE <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - Find =
messages
> by this author
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:26:39 -0700
> Local: Sun,Jun 5 2005 2:26 am
> Subject: Re: Anybody else had dealings with Jim Rojas ??
> Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
> original | Report Abuse
>=20
> >Why would you post that stuff anyway?<
>=20
> Basically because I felt like it.
> Bass tries to sell himself as some upstanding pillar of society, and
> his police record shows otherwise. If Bass can't handle RL info being
> put out there he shouldn't be so quick to go RL on other folks. It
> didn't seem to be an issue when Pinkie posted bogus info about Norm
> Mugford.
>=20
>