Re: 20. RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm systems..

["mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I got a finger for you, Paul. The index one on my right hand.

<-pull@shoot> wrote in message
news:9l11a1d1u9q0mp33i826p77biotb98cb3r@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> They look great professionals with theyre "finger in the wind"
> techniques to detect RFI...
>
> That's where "so called" professionals experiance is comming from head
> to bottom, they have mechanical feelings!
>
>      RFI brain probe
>           \  /
>        ____\/____
>       / ___  ___ \
>      / / @ \/ @ \ \
>      \ \___/\___/ /\
>       \____\/____/||
>         \Bottle/
>          |neck |      Pro's in
>         /      \       Pissing
>        /        \       Contest
>       |          \
>       |           |
>      /            |
>      |            ===.    10 mW
>      \           OO   \    output
>       |           |    o    power!
>       |          /      o
>       \_________/        o
>          || ||      \___,,,__ /
>          || ||       |  WAS  |O
>         _||_||_      \_______/
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 18:55:38 GMT, "Roger" <rumble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >No. You didn't 'show'... you said. Very different thing. By the way,
you're
> >stupid :-)
> >
> >
> ><-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> >news:139f91hvab1v58q8nqkrihenm82omi317j@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm
> >> systems in several posts.
> >> I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for
> >> more than 1 year before i discovered it by accident, no warning.
> >> By measuring i found the original source of RFI, my wireless
> >> headphone;
> >>
> >> Notice that there was no warning and that pro's confirm, 20+ years of
> >> theyre experience = no RFI warning.
> >>
> >> I also have explained how wireless alarm system radio data is send
> >> from sensors to the receiver and how it is jeopardized by collisions
> >> and interferences.
> >> I mentioned too that the frequencies used by wireless alarm systems
> >> are authority interference unprotected ones and of free use by anybody
> >> (you, car keys, light dimmers, headphones (the worst) and more).
> >>
> >> I DON'T SELL any alarm system but can't admit, like i was induced in
> >> error, that owners and future owners are mislead on the subject by low
> >> level mechanics who have not the most elementary clue on radio
> >> communication.
> >> The only reaction where insults.. but coming from low level hammer
> >> and cleaning cloth handlers, it will mot muzzle me.
> >>
> >> WHY do manufacturers not provide any specification on theyre wireless
> >> data communication loop; its the only thing who is different in
> >> comparisons to wired systems.
> >> Why do they not specify wireless receiver and transmitter data on
> >> theyre wireless goodies or is it junk?
> >>
> >
>