[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

41. Nose leading... Leg twisting... Pro's



So called "hands-on pro's" always attempt to justify the reliability
of wireless alarm systems without manufacturer specifications and
support.
 Its so simple to have the manufacturer specify / warrant theyre
product reliability against Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)..
 Who knows better than the product designer, -tester, -producer?
 Why do manufacturers not specify that attempt of "hands-on pro's" who
explain a imaginative RFI detection system?

Does the salesman;
Does the installer;
 or
Does the monitoring agent know better?
 They seems to be the only who know that the night owl cry (RFI
detection) don't exist; NO ALARM during RFI, but they don't tell that
to everybody!

Who attempt purchaser "nose leading", some call that "Leg twisting"?


At least it seems that I succeed with the "so called" alarm pro's and
they're imaginative unsuccessful and unjustified statements subject
wireless alarm systems reliability during RFI.

By the way, do somebody have a small tool called "nose players", it
will allow to twist "so called" pro's verbal juice even more.

I don't think that you have "nose players" oversees but its not
required, it seems that you have "jumping beans" instead...
 A lot of "jumping beans" are present in this NG at least.



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home