[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?

Subject: Re: 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?
From: -pull@shoot
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:02:50 +0200
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <u8ugb1pkgnfbinkg9b8rk2i6e55prl5bt2@xxxxxxx> <N41ue.5179$eV4.3477@fed1read01>

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:08:21 -0700, "alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>-- wrote:
>> Have a look to the amazing number of "jumping beans" who are present
>> in this NG...
>>
>> Tel them about the Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI) miserable
>> effect on wireless alarm systems, no alarms of any kind any more
>> and there it goes with very,
>>  very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very pertinent
>> counter-arguments!
>
>Jumping Beans??
>js

They heat temselve up and jump like hell....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?
  - From: -- <.-.>
- Re: 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: Re: Anybody else had dealings with Jim Rojas ??
Next by Message: Re: The *All NEW* Robert L Bass google game!
Previous by thread: Re: 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?
Next by thread: Re: 40. Pro's = Jumping Beans?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home