Re: 13. Why that childish behavior of pro's subject wireless fails ?

[-pull@shoot]

On Sat, 07 May 2005 10:09:01 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:

>
>Why that childish behavior of some "so called" professionals when it
>boils down to Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) subject wireless
>fire/intruder detection systems fails?
>
>Pro's, make an inside look and recall the knowledge prerequisite
>needed to be a professional alarm system installer, no minimal radio
>data communication knowledge required.
>
>But that doesn't explain everything,
>- wireless is something you can't touch;
>- you can't see it;
>- you can't use your conventional hammer and cleaning cloths
>  technique;
>- you don't master radio waves techniques otherwise you would
>  know that RFI is a well-known common problem in wireless data
>  communications.
>The usual cleaning of the product you practice or the replacement of
>mechanical parts don't improve the quality !
>
>Professional "executors", the experienced man you are is not
>responsible of RFI problems, ask your Boss (manager) to contact the
>manufacturers.
> That they show theyre credits about the wireless data loop.
> You can't modify the internal software program.
> You can't improve the data loop receiver/transmitter quality, it's
>all out of your control and in the hands of the manufacturers.
>
>When you say that you are programming these system, well call it that
>way if you like and think it enhance your image but everybody knows
>that it is a low level "setup" your do, nothing more.
>
>RFI is a problem the manufacturers have to solve, IF THEY CAN(maybe)!
> The problem of RFI is generated at the outside and out of they're
>control too, the frequencies they are allowed to operate theyre
>systems on are crowded and not law protected against RFI, they are
>shared by others for the best and the worst, usually the worst.
>
>He boss, behave like a "Manager" and ask for manufacturer
>specification support, this will avoid endless stupid discussions and
>childish behaviors of your executors.
> You have to be a grownup manager and let childish behaviors for your
>low level electricians :
>- it's not your fault that wireless alarm systems are unreliable
>  during RFI
>- it's not your fault that wireless alarm systems are muzzled and
>  dead during RFI when a detected sensor action is required.
>
>Ask manufacturers spec.'s specifying how they protect they're wireless
>data link muzzling due to RFI and stop to find-out some imaginary
>build-in stuff who is not published and supported by them.
>
>Even if you don't believe in RFI, spec.'s allow you, and the eventual
>purchasers of a system, to make a choice between manufacturers
>products.
> There are spec.'s on sensors but not on the "unique" wireless data
>loop that replace the "individual" sensor connections in wired
>systems, why?
> Actually you are blind, the manufacturers even don't provide you with
>the most elementary data about the receiver of they're wireless "data
>communication", the basic difference and weak point compared to wired
>systems.
>
> I repeat in the case you missed the above:
>
>   He boss (manager) ask manufacturers support !
>   Ask manufacturer product spec.'s about they're wireless stuff.
>
>Professional "executors" ask your boss (manager) to act at the
>manufacturers level instead of inventing stupid and unsupported
>assumptions.
>
>Paul