Re: 9. Test your wireless alarm equipment

[-pull@shoot]

On Fri, 06 May 2005 08:57:20 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:

>
>==========================================================
>NOTE: Measurement tools are not intended for intruders..
>      Its to difficult for them to set that up of course
>      they have not specialists (???) at theyre disposal
>      like you guy's supposed to be "so called" pro's.
>==========================================================
>
>The continuing ignorance of "so called pro's" about
>     Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)
>and that it muzzle "ALL" wireless alarm system (even the latest sold
>systems) find-out by yourself how easy it is to muzzle them to dead.
>
>You like to TEST the reliability of your wireless alarm system?
>- You like to find-out that a transmitter can muzzle the receiver
>  and fail your entire detection system?
>- You like to find-out if your system is really equipped with some
>  kind of RFI detection circuit (like some pretend) and how long
>  it takes to warn you (intruder delay)?
>
>Well, purchase for a few boxes an "authority certified" RF transmitter
>"operating on" your wireless alarm frequency
>
>For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
>www.mipot.com
>http://www.aurel.it/
>www.rfsolutions.co.uk
>and Electronic magazines (if you understand electronics)
>
>When you have that famous manufacturer unsupported RFI interference
>detection circuit (some pro's pretend), look at the nice "alarm
>whistle" shown in the vicinity and "police" movements (false police
>alarm), you allow them to stretch theyre legs when you put your test
>device ON.
> They will like that kind of leg stretching sport because you can
>repeat false alarms infinitely in order to keep them up to speed.
>
>If you don't have that famous manufacturer unsupported RFI detection
>circuit, note how quite your system is, no warning on intruder or
>tamper detection (my case), your system is just dead.
>
> Happy testing.
>
>Paul