Re: Notifier AFB-200

["Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:as3oe1tbnf5hj18o4d6hg6q4rhipfamn59@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> The OP didn't ask how to default a FIRE panel.  He asked if anyone knows
>>> how to return the PASSWORDS to default on the panel.  Is there some
>>> reason
>>> you think it's necessary to yell FIRE when discussing the panel?
>>
>> Defaulting the passwords to the AFP-200 panel
>> *will* enable the OP to change the programming
>> parameters of the system...
>
> You seem to confuse allowing saomeone to make programming changes
> with defaulting the panel.  Perhaps if ytou actually installed
> fire alarm systems you would have known that.

Nope...  I'm not "confused" at all...  I simply won't give someone I don't
know (or can't verify) the means to enter installer level programming on a
functioning fire alarm panel.  Since you've obviously the one that's never
installed a fire alarm system I only wanted to educate you to the facts...


>
>> I don't give out the means to do this on *any* fire alarm panel...
>
> Unless you can figure out how to do so by reading the manual.

Heh...   You can't "default" the password on an AFP-200 by "reading the
manual".  There's no means to do that.  There is, however, a way of
"cracking" the existing code that involves some basic arithmetic (and since
you still insist that "15" equals "28" the even this would be well beyond
your present capabilities).



<snip>


> You're the moron who claimed to have snap-rolled a 737.

Nope...  The only aircraft which *I* personally have "snap-rolled" consist
of a Cessna 150 "Aerobat", a Decathalon, and a Pitts Special...

> You
> don't get to tell such bullshit stories and then pretend you're
> not a liar.

Heh...  And the "proof" of this is what, Mr. "Aviation Expert"??  More
moronic explanations involving mis-spelled words like "aeleron", or terms
like "negative lift", and "angle of attack of the wind"??  You *say* you had
a student pilot permit at one time...  It's quite obvious to me that you
flunked ground school...  Face it, Robert:

1.  Cessna *still* doesn't make a "152 tail-dragger" (or even a "150 tail
dragger").

2.  An aircraft is perfectly capable of flying upside down *and* maintaining
a constant altitude (as long as it's equipped with things like inverted oil
and fuel systems and the pilot is well-strapped in).

3.  Convair (in the '50's) made a number of different aircraft types most of
which didn't hold a candle to the performance demonstrated by the Avro
Arrow.

5.  The Cessna 182 has fixed tricycle undercarriage and only when you put an
"RG" designation on it does it mean the gear is retractable.

6.  The Cessna 150 was *not* the predecessor of the "182".  The "180" was.

7.  You can exceed a 60 degree bank angle in all modern passenger jets and
still affect full recovery to level flight.

8.  You can punch "full left rudder" in any modern passenger jet.  You will
not get full deflection of the rudder (or any control surface for that
matter) "at flight speeds" as the flight control system employs limiters
that prohibit large scale movements.  These are designed to ensure the
aircraft's structural integrity isn't compromised.  I would not expect you
to understand (or even know) this as you've never actually flown "heavy
iron" (and quite obviously have never really conversed with someone that
has).

9.  You can successfully roll a Boeing 737-200 with minimal loss of
altitude.  I'm a living witness to this fact.  I have no doubt that *any* of
Mr. Boeings aircraft can demonstrate a full roll maneuver without any
"hiccups".  If you put Bob Hoover at the controls of *any* commercial
transport, I'm certain you'll witness aerobatics the likes of which you've
only ever dreamed of.  At Abbotsford one year, I saw him put a Twin
Commander through maneuvers that would make even the designers at Rockwell
cringe.

10.  "4" is missing as a courtesy to Mark (who often whines when it's
included in a "list" of this type).


>
>> Did you finally get ahold of Elk Technical Support??
>
> Prior to replying to the original question, yes.

Liar.  You got "caught" once again trying to impress people with product
knowledge you don't have, and even now can't make up your mind whether you
have an ELK M1-Gold in your house or a Napco 9600...  Ohhh... I forgot...
You have *both*...  An ELK in your *office* and a Napco 9600 in your
house...  Must get pretty confusing for the wife considering you have a
home-office...


>
>>  Did they tell you all about the M1XEP??
>
> They had a good laugh at your posts.

Uh-huh...  Who did you talk to at Elk??  And where is it that I work again??