Re: Rogers dropping usenet

["mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxx>]

http://www.inboxer.com/  It's only for Outlook but integrates superbly

"Allan Waghalter" <awaghalter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ZWkkf.3712$Y%5.2434@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I am using "Spam Blocker".  It is catching 99% of my spam, about 100 each
> day.  Puts the rejects in a separate  folder for easy review and allows
for
> adding or removing an address at will.  Your blocks are also sent back to
> Spam Blocker to be included in the revised database.  They have a 30 day
> free trial.  They were ranked #1 by consumer report.
> Allan
>
>
> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ueadnRKrC6mVJAzenZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I think they're scoundrels. Remember Cableguard back in the 70s?
> > They didn't bother telling people they were using diallers like
> > everybody else because their shit didn't work.
> >
> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:VNudnfI9CaA8nQzenZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Yeah, that's the final straw ! I had planned to switch to high speed
> >> Sympatico but hadn't made the move yet. If the newsgroup is not going
to
> > be
> >> available through Rogers, I'm going to get rid of the high speed cable
> >> connection and go DSL.
> >>
> >> Rogers pulls some pretty stupid moves sometimes. Their marketing guys
> > ought
> >> to go back to school - you don't ever drop something that a customer
has
> > had
> >> all along without reducing the rate....jessus.....
> >>
> >> I hope they lose a bucket load of business over this....
> >>
> >> RHC
> >>
> >> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:76qdnYXqt8QZbg3eRVn-hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > rogers is dropping it here on the 15th... I have to find an
alternative
> >> > and
> >> > yes, html sucks
> >> > for this kind of thing
> >> >
> >> > "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:P16kf.59$p96.2372@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> yah don't use the html viewer...newsreader is the way to go..quick
and
> >> > easy.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "mikey" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >> news:1133571084.089057.221110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> | Yuck. I'm trying the google groups and it seems a step backwards.
> >> >> | I was using the Microsoft newsreader and it was straight-forward
and
> >> >> | quick
> >> >> | whatthefuck?
> >> >> | are there any other alternatives out there similar to what I'm
used
> > to?
> >> >> |
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> >> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>