Re: UL Required to get License

["Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, when you have a state alarm association that is representing over 750
member companies in the State of Florida, people start to listen. I know
your old feelings about the organization and not trying to push it on you.
Florida is now the largest State alarm association in the country and
growing. When this issue stopped licensed people from working in their
trade, it needed to be addressed. One voice representing the majority was
the best approach. One of the first steps was to make sure UL was operating
legally and was regulated the same as the rest of us in the fire industry. I
am glad that you, being one of the old timers, agree that there was
something that smelled like three day old company.

"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tXllf.1783$EB3.1730@xxxxxxxxxxx
> I for one am glad to see Florida is finally waking up. UL has it's place,
> but they seem to forget they are not all knowing...and they are not exempt
> from anything, especially licensing.
>
> I got out of the fire alarm business 11 years ago. Boy did I see all this
> crap coming... :)
>
> Jim Rojas
>
>
> <mbbaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1133898322.200818.271990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Gotcha.  It's common to see licensing required of persons testing but
> > not for those inspecting.  Apparently Florida requires licensing for
> > either.
> >
>
>
>