[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unused Zones

Subject: Re: Unused Zones
From: "Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:10:33 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1123533900.655866.40250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1123564586.866123.14380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <K6udnUtKP-2-62TfRVn-vg@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1123652396.872436.144150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<cctvbahamas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123652396.872436.144150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> whoops, sorry, too used to ademco .. like to try the GE panels one day
> though anyway, so good to know for the future.
>
The NX-8, NX-8V2, and NX-8E run circles around most of Ademco's/Honeywell's
Vista series controls (except for the Vista128 & 250 panels)... The GE
Networx line is easier to program, offers more features per dollar, is
easier for the end-user to operate, and works with most ITI transmitters
when using one of the NX series receivers... Just my 1/2 cent, Russ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unused Zones
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- Unused Zones
  - From: Nick
- Re: Unused Zones
  - From: cctvbahamas
- Re: Unused Zones
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Unused Zones
  - From: cctvbahamas

Prev by Message: Re: What are these security camera files?
Next by Message: Re: Interfacing alarm panel to satellite phone
Previous by thread: Re: Unused Zones
Next by thread: Re: Unused Zones
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home