Re: newbie needs advice

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Does your doctor warranty the physco drugs he has you on?
You're the only "wireless densor" we have here.


<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:qisa61l1m5b8uqier4iocbvmgg07lhbpk9@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:34:02 GMT, "John O"
> <johno@#no^spam&heathkit.com> wrote:
>=20
> >> Ok thanks I see that now.
> >
> >If you were protecting the Louvre, or some such valuable and =
highly-sought=20
> >thing then wireless might not be the first choice. But you're looking =
to=20
> >stop punks and thugs, and they wouldn't know modulation from =
moderation,=20
> >which means wireless densors would be just as secure as anything =
else.
> >
> >So although it IS technically possible to hang up a wireless alarm =
system=20
> >and render it blind, it just doesn't happen in the real world.
> >
> >-John O=20
>=20
> Strange, pro's say in this group that RFI occur and according to you
> it never happen, strange.
>=20
> A lot of strange statements are mentioned by "so called" pro's who
> mention:
> 1. RFI exist and can't be avoided
> :  (true);
> 2. There is a RFI detection in the "modern" wireless alarm
>    systems
> :  (but its not supported with manufacturer written data).
> 3. The wireless alarm systems are working fine, no RFI detected
>    since 20+ years and 100000+ systems
> :  (???);
> 4. They have no RFI reliability measurement tools except theyre
>    on site experience
> :  (finger in the wind technique);
> 5. There is no manufacturer support whatsoever on that RFI subject.
> :  !!!
> There are a lot of contradictions in what they say..
>  Why do pro's not call the manufacturers for RFI written warranted
> statements and support about the RFI problem?
>  How is it possible too be so Unprofessional.
>=20
> Wireless alarm systems are no longer installed by "real" professionals
> because they know installation can be detected from the outside with a
> simple receiver, can be muzzled with RFI, its just unreliable.
>=20
> Paul
>=20
>