Re: Re: Changes to Protocol Docs - a Summary

["Paul Robinson" <ukcueman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

What about version numbers like "1.2rc1" or "1.3b" to
indicate whether this is beta or a
release candidate etc

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Lowe" <ian.lowe@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_xpl] Re: Changes to Protocol Docs - a Summary


> Yeah - I don't see the need to enforce a specific format, beyond
> specifying what it can contain: numbers and decimal points only, no
> leading "v" or "ver" etc.
>
> Ian.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Paul Robinson
> Sent: 26 September 2005 11:54
> To: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_xpl] Re: Changes to Protocol Docs - a Summary
>
> > If we're going to specify the format of the version number, can I
make
>
> > an appeal for a 3 part numerals only version e.g 4.12.1543 - then
it
> > would match the version numbering system in the Windows Installer
that
>
> > most of us use to package our apps.
> Is it necessary to tie developers to a particular format? Saying that
it
> shouldn't be prefixed by "version" or "v" etc is
quite different from
> specifying exactly how they should be formatted.
>
> Paul
>
>






___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with
voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com