[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Standalone xPL Hub Summary
- Subject: Re: Standalone xPL Hub Summary
- From: Gerry Duprey <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:21:59 -0400
- References:
<200509151300.j8FD0n031772@mail.cdp1802.org>
Howdy,
> If this came about, I feel this would be a change to the fundamentals
of
> xpl, something that was agreed couldn't be played with
>
> I'm sure we won't need to do this, if we did then I (for one) would be
very
> unhappy about it
>
> Just thought I'd better make my own position clear on this point i.e.
stick
> my oar in ;-)
It's a good point and I don't think having or not having a .probe type is
really going to do anything -- just maybe an option to filter that I can't
come up with a good case for.
So I'm onboard with the standard hbeat/config schema types!
Gerry
--
Gerry Duprey
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
http://www.cdp1802.org
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|