Re: xPLRioNet - The Vote

["UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have 4 Rios... can I vote 4 times :P

A for me - for obvious reasons...

I think I missed the deadline anyway


Andy

On 14/01/2005 at 20:05 Tony Tofts wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>After a lot of messing around today I've come to the conclusion that
the
>Rio
>client will need a complete a rewrite to fix the 320kbps issue.
>
>As such it will take up weeks of development time.
>
>So the question is - do we:
>
>A) drop everything else and concentrate on the new rio client
>
>B) work on the other requests, and come back to rio at a later date
>
>Please note, any votes for "both A _and_ B" will be ignored!
>
>I'm going to make the decision based on all votes received in the next
24
>hours.
>
>So please reply to this post stating your preference.
>
>I'm voting 'B'
>
>Thanks
>Tony
>
>
>
>xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com
>http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
>To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
>To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
>To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>




xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx