Re: new X10 component: medusa-cm11

["tomvdp" <tomvdp@xxxxxxxxx>]

> xPL was always designed to be used around a central controller(s)
not
> point-to-point. i.e. the xpl apps/devices are inputs and/or outputs
to the
> central brain. So rather than (like xap?) where a finger can cause
another
> finger to move, with xpl it was intended that a finger moves, the
brain
> makes a decision, and then moves the other finger. In my opinion
that means
> the schemas can be somewhat "looser"? i.e. not atomic to a
particular use.

I fully agree.  This is exactly my point: you don't want your finger
to start thinking for itself :-)

Anyway, with the confirm message issues out of the way, I can easily
adapt the app to become fully x10.basic compliant.

I suppose then that it will also be easier for HAL script integration
that the xplcm11 component sends a confirm message per device even
when it was possible to join them as 1 X10 command ?  I.e.:
command=ON
device=A1,A2
->
send 2 confirm messages, hence
sub X10_A1_ON_Trigger(xplmsg)
sub X10_A2_ON_Trigger(xplmsg)
will be called in turn.

Regards,
Tom





xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx