Re: Appearance of 'DOH!' in xplRIOnet Web Interface

["craigssullivan" <craigssullivan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

So, in looking at the rio.htm file that is generated when I navigate
with my browser, the {status} parameter is replaced with 'DOH!' but
it appears in the web.xml file and the source rio.htm if I open it
in notepad. I'm not able to figure out what the issue is with the
current playlist as that is not available in those files.

Any suggestions?


--- In ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx, "craigssullivan"
<craigssullivan@h...> wrote:
> re web.xml - thanks, I'll investigate that...
>
> re the receiver.arf file - is it possible then to use the original
> one with the xplRionet server running?
>
> --- In ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx, "Tony Tofts" <tony@x> wrote:
> > > I've been using this happily for a couple of weeks now and
> > > have noticed this week that, when accessing the web
interface
> > > to control my Rio devices the word 'DOH!' appears in place
of
> > > some of the image controls in the playlist and also in place
> > > of the Rio status text.
> > >
> > > It has happened for me before and I ended up having to
> > > re-install xplRionet completely. I haven't moved or modified
> > > any of the images since they were last visible in the web
> > > interface. Anyone else having this problem?
> >
> > The DOH! Text means it can't find an entry in web.xml to match a
> {name}
> > parameter on the web page
> >
> > Please can you cross check your web.xml against the web page,
and
> try
> > opening the web.xml in IE to check it's not corrupt
> >
> > A missing image won't cause it, you'll just get a broken link,
it
> can only
> > happen if a {param} is missing from web.xml
> >
> > > Oh, and one other thing; has anyone using this for their
Rios
> > > noticed any degradation in sound quality between this and
the
> > > standard Rio software? It seems to me as though there is
> > > slightly less in the lower frequencies when using xplRionet
> > > verses the standard client. Is there any reason why this
> > > would be the case?
> >
> > Xplrionet purely passes the mp3 file to the client, it does
> nothing to the
> > file so can't effect it
> >
> > The receiver.arf used by xplrionet isn't the same one used by
the
> standard
> > software, so any issue must lie here I guess.
> >
> > The client used was selected on the basis of extra functionality
> (over the
> > original client) that many users wanted (including native
ogg/flac
> support).
> >
> > Can't say I have a good enough ear to spot what you mention,
maybe
> others
> > can?
> >
> > Regards
> > Tony