[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: xPLMediaNet various
- Subject: Re: xPLMediaNet various
- From: Tom Van den Panhuyzen <tomvdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:50:25 +0200
- References:
<424ce404.3e4817ec.1a65.61dbSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
>
> However, I am thinking that the "media.dll" source should
generate some
> additional reference tables for artist/album/genre lists. This would
make
> displaying the lists much faster for people who have a lot of tracks,
as
> currently these lists are generated are by processing the complete
list of
> tracks?
>
> Obviously this makes the database bigger, but is probably worth it?
>
> Any thoughts/comments please?
>
If all the data for these artist/album/genre lists is already in the
one flat table, it is better to index on the fields that you will make
lists of.
E.g.
select distinct artist_name
from artists
will be efficient if you have indexed artist_name. In this case there
is no need for a seperate table with only artist_name values.
Hth,
Tom
xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe: ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe: ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|