[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: DMX and xPL
- Subject: RE: Re: DMX and xPL
- From: Williams Christopher C <ccwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:37:12 +0100
What became of CEBus (www.cebus.org)? This looks like it was going to be
Super-X10.
Chris
________________________________________
From: Mal Lansell [mailto:mlansell@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 28 October 2004 11:40
To: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_xpl] Re: DMX and xPL
Then the issue is really one of how to connect these devices, so the switch
can transmit to the lamp.=A0 The nice thing about X10 is that it is easily
retrofitted since it uses existing wiring.=A0 Unfortunately most switches
h=
ave
only two wires run to them, which means either placing the logic with the
lamp, or some form of wireless device (or a lot of dust and redecorating!)
I wonder if the time is right for a Super-X10 - a higher speed and reliable
protocol but still using mains wiring?
Is it even possible, or is there just too much noise on the line?
Mal
The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence
is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).
For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution,
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information
is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Emails and other electronic communication with QinetiQ may be monitored.
Calls to QinetiQ may be recorded for quality control,
regulatory and monitoring purposes.
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|