The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: xPLLib v3.0 Public Beta


  • Subject: RE: xPLLib v3.0 Public Beta
  • From: "Tony Tofts" <tony@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:55:40 -0000


> I guess the question is: Do we want any app to be able to act
> as a hub, or are we happy with the present situation where
> the user specifically designates an application to act as the hub.
> It has always been the view of the xPL team that there should
> be only one app that can act as a hub on a computer at once,
> so that end-users receive consistent results.
> What are people's views on this?

Hi John,

I have no problem with the principle of an app being able to act as a hub,
but I'm not sure about the mutex idea.

The incompatibility between mutex and non .net app's worries me somewhat.

Personally I would prefer an approach where app's that can act as hubs
regularly try to bind to the xpl port instead?

> My own view (and I think this differs from Tom) is that it
> should continue to accept traffic from the network by default.

I would have to agree with this. Things like windows firewall already
complicate troubleshooting particular issues, I think locking down to the
local ip by default just makes support more complicated?

Just my thoughts

Regards
Tony





xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.