[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC xplOccupancy
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Mc Alinden [mailto:fmcalind@xxxxxxx]
>But seeing how quiet the list is of late i suspect everyone is very
busy >with work.........
Indeed - I think there's a general feeling of taking a break... I have
left the main ukha_d list (for a while at least, I may go back) as I'm
not finding the time to read it, and have so little free time to spend
on HA projects that it's really on the back burner.
That being said - I'll have a wee think around the whole occupancy
thing. My gut instinct is that occupancy is less of a schema thing than
an xplhal globals type thing...
My gut reaction is that the sorts of things being discussed fall more
within the remit of sensor.basic type messages, and an occupancy schema
(if one is needed) should be centred on locations rather than sensors..
I.
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|