[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: xPL Hubs
Hi Gerry,
> One problem I can see with using the mutex approach is integration
with other
> non-.NET (or non-native) apps. For example, if there is a Java based
app
> running on the same machine as one hosting some of the .NET derived
apps, the
> Java app cannot participate in using the mutex.
I don't think this should turn out to be a major problem.
The mutex is really there as a quick way of detecting the failure of an
existing mutex-aware hub.
In reality, because we are saying that only services should act as hubs
(due to the fact that they're running all the time), the mutex feature will
probably not be used a great deal.
The only difference is that if your Java framework is providing the hub,
and then is shut down, it will take longer for another application to
realise that the hub has failed.
Apart from this increased delay in re-establishing the existance of a hub,
I don't think there should be any major compatibility issues.
Regards,
John
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|