RE: xPLHal scripting matches

[Tony Tofts]

> I think it would be better if the message came in, and all
> matching subs were executed - and if it's sequential,
> sys.break() could be used to tell xPLHal not to continue
> processing beyond the current point.

This can be done, if they do run sequentially, but it means the constructs
will need to very carefully done. There's a strong chance the _same_ script
could run multiple times, dependent on the users approach to building the
consturcts?

> Either way... it's quite a big change, and probably not
> something we have the time to look into for a while :-(

Making it loop thru all matches is a minor change, but not sure how the
sys.break command could flag the thread?

Regards
Tony