RE: xPLHal scripting matches

[Tony Tofts]

> I'd prefer it to carry on processing, and maybe issue something like:
> sys.terminate() or sys.break() if you want it to not process
> any more scripts.
>
> Tony - could this be done?

Since we currently don't process any further scripts, a sys.break would
have
no use?

Are we saying xplhal should process all matches, launching multiple scripts
for each message?

Actually sys.break wouldn't work, since by the time it is called - the
other
scripts would already be in progress?

Thoughts?

Thanks
Tony