The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: audio.basic schema question


  • Subject: RE: audio.basic schema question
  • From: John B
  • Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 22:20:00 +0000

> > set of extended commands) I would think the most compatible
> > solution is
> >
> > "command=none"
>
> Seems fine to me, or make it optional?

I'd go with the command=none, and stipulate to any schema that uses the
command=
tag that it should be able to successfully ignore a command=3Dnone.

Don't think we should make command optional, as that screws all the main
schema
requirements on ordering of tags etc.

> > This is important to get right, as we will be needing
> > something similar on the OSD schema too: a "clear"
command,
> > as well as things like "blink"...
> >
> > the other thing to be resolved "once and for all" is
whether
> > it's command= and extended= or cmd= and ext=
> >
> > Personally, my vote goes for the long versions.
>
> That's my vote too.

Sounds fine with me.

Regards,

John






xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.