[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Configuration process
- Subject: RE: Configuration process
- From: Keith Doxey
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:45:00 +0000
Thanks for the clarification Ian.
I take your points about simplicity on board and if I so choose, I can use
xPL as my protocol yet still implement what I describe below by giving
DIYHA-MANAGER.KHAN (Keiths_Home_Automation_Network)
the intelligence within the PC application to do whatever I want to do.
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk
www.kat5.tv
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:<a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=SHsWPM642xbUeLTuvJ0cXGvv4Vk_eYqi5oJR3YdBOGWb8TE68hwRrhH1CC7mcerKTx-EJNFo-UP3d42_">ian@w...</a>]
Sent: 14 January 2003 22:15
To: <a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=8CLasU8vQ4ZqVg4QqP9e1XsEsaSKNXqV_IZBTidpW7w955J4q-GUAjGQKfwPhSNED6jOlvGKPiauIvohSAQ">ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx</a>
Subject: RE: [ukha_xpl] Configuration process
>Apologies if this was covered in the xAP group but even if it was, it
could
>well be different here!
Configuration is, as I understand it, pending v1.3 in xAP, so it may end up
similar!
>What happens if several similar devices have been plugged in ?
Confusion reigns! in all probability, the config message would end up with
both devices taking on the new ID, and much gnashing of teeth would
follow..
The short version, "extremely simple" is the watchword, and you
have a
little more work as an installer, in return for greater simplicity in
getting to that point!
>having to go back to the console everytime a device was installed would
be
>tiresome to say the least.
possibly, but it is a one-time only process.
>Presumably each device would have to have some form of non-volatile
memory
>such as EEPROM to store its config otherwise it would need to be
>re-addressed after each power failure.
Yep. It's implied that any device which can be configured has some
mechanism
for retaining this configuration between power-ups.
>One further point that I dont specifically see mentioned in the spec
are
the
>delimiters identification. I am assuming that because the fields are
not
>fixed length but length limited that "-" delimits
VENDOR-DEVICE and "."
>delimits DEVICE.INSTANCE is this correct.
That's correct, I'll get the document updated.
>Also is white space banned/ignored unless it falls between
"=" and <CR> in
a
>name/value pair as per xAP.
ditto, again, I'll get the doc updated.
>Makes interesting reading :-)
Thanks Keith!
I.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=W21CtyyeCFbsOp5QsWGF61Bne9WptbnorxR_X1sLwvq8Yk67IepkZV4mNvdgnCle_lXU_GzxjRodlhu-J4NO-vU3Yj_YZMf-zS4">ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx</a>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a>
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|