The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Fw: error checking +Instance Question


  • Subject: Fw: error checking +Instance Question
  • From: Frank Mc Alinden
  • Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:43:00 +0000


----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Mc Alinden" <<a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=7CZGLbqcwn8f7YhplML7fw9tEBCe1czOkKs5mdDZH5wtSWd-goFjfs7SM8TUb4d-w0GHDnL-2rZbzEA70iALI90">fmcalind@b...</a>>
To: <<a
href="/group/ukha_xpl/post?postID=5O_kS7VvVK206MwDwfsNHb1L2ORu5EpDqmYADvNdftQa1bOTrUyUrHeK_v5Ci6KM8viOlY8KLA0e16BZ2t8CeaU">ukha_d@xxxxxxx</a>>
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 8:41 AM
Subject: error checking +Instance Question


> Hi All
> Just doing some error checking on the pic/osd and was wondering if
> one of the options was spelt incorrectly in the message should the
whole
> message be discarded or the default setting used for that option
.....At
the
> moment if say i receive colum=**....it will default to column 5 since
the
n
> is missing ...is this correct ??? or should it be discarded ??
>
> Also is it possible to make the reconfigurables ie instance a fixed
number
> of characters....What im going to try and do is...rewrite the instance
in
my
> program memory table and this would make it a lot easier than jumping
in
and
> out of tables..would also copy new configs to eeprom ..
> Thanks
> Frank
>






xPL Main Index | xPL Thread Index | xPL Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.