RE: Re: Proposal / RFC: Change xAP wire format

["Edward Pearson" <xap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Patrick (or anybody),

got any examples of how your think xAP-Json would look like?
Thinking of having a play with this; assume you have some idea of what the
mapping would look like and that it's not very different from the current
format.
Can you post some example translations please. Wondering if the two can
coexist.
Edward

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xAP_developer@xxxxxxx
> [mailto:xAP_developer@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of nightrader2k
> Sent: 23 December 2011 20:53
> To: xAP_developer@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [xAP_developer] Re: Proposal / RFC: Change xAP wire format
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   I think the benefits of JSON far out weight any uC limitations. as
Kevin
> stated, the embedded devices are getting faster all the time.
>
> I just purchased an Arduino Mega2560 for under $40.  That has plenty
of
> horsepower to handle xAPJ and with the announcement of the DUE, I
think
> the future could be bright for a xAPJ version/extension.
>
> I'm not using it but there is already a JSON library available for the
Arduino
> line. http://interactive-matter.eu/how-to/ajson-arduino-json-library/
>
> just my thoughts,
> Gene
>
> --- In xAP_developer@xxxxxxx, Kevin Hawkins
> <yahoogroupskh@...> wrote:
>
> > JSON really offers no benefit for low speed devices so it's a bit
of a
> > red herring in that respect.   What's good is that embedded
devices are
> > becoming faster, larger in capacity  and lower in cost so this is
a
> > diminishing problem...    It would be neat to be able to
implement xAP
> > on a $5 device though.
> >
> > K
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


------------------------------------