[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vendor Id registration
- Subject: Re: Vendor Id registration
- From: "m.rintala" <mikko.rintala@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:39:45 -0000
Hi,
Thanks! Most probably I will use TSC schema, since that covers allmost
all my needs. I assume that it is not possible use more than one
schema
in one message. I have temperature sensors and relays attached to
temperature alarm messages, TSC would cover sensor level and BSC
relay status. So, two different messages are required if schema is
respected?
Best regards,
Mikko Rintala
MR Soft
--- In xAP_developer@xxxxxxx, Kevin Hawkins
<yahoogroupskh@...> wrote:
>
> Welcome Mikko - and you have 'MRSoft' reserved for your Vendor ID.
>
> You should probably consider using the BSC and/or TSC schema for
your
> application
>
> BSC is most prolific and hence a favourite for compatibility but it
> doesn't handle temperature too well - meaning that you will have to
> present your devices as 'TEXT' rather than 'LEVEL' based devices.
This
> is because BSC Level devices can't have negative values and also
there
> is no provision for identifying the units of measurement.
> http://www.xapautomation.org/index.php?
title=Basic_Status_and_Control_Schema
>
> TSC is a new schema aimed at exactly your needs (Telemetry Status
and
> Control) . It is based around BSC but includes other approriate
> aspects for sensor data.
> http://www.xapautomation.org/index.php?
title=xAP_Telemetry_Status_and_Control_Schema
>
> Any questions... just ask away.
>
> cheers Kevin
------------------------------------
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|