[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Addressing vs sub-adressing
> Well yes but you have three xAP applications (devices) now and each
> will have the responsibilities and overhead outlined above which
> wastes codespace and time. Maybe I'm missing something but I don't
see
> any advantage , and see disadvantages, compared with
>
> elperepat.node.master:blind.southeastwindow
> elperepat.node.master:display.bedroom
> elperepat.node.master:sensor.outdoor:temperature
>
> elperepat.node.master:sensor.indoor:temperature
> elperepat.node.master:serial.connection.callerID
>
> now only one xAP device
> elperepat.node.master
>
Ok, thanks! I didn't looked at the implication of that scheme on the
overhead (protocol).
I can also see the limitation of having only 255 subaddresses. Any
clue on the official release of the new protocol definition? I'll
certainly benefit the new 65535 limit!
Thanks
Patrick
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|