Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Re: Subgroup UIDs
Kevin Hawkins wrote:
>>4) I'm fully expecting the requirement to sequence new base (4
>>UIDs as the mapping table "rolls over" 254. What is
unclear to me is
>>whether I must also have a unique source name for each new base
>>I'm very much hoping not as it would be arbitrary and only exist
>>the 254 limit on subaddresses.
>This is a current restriction based on only supporting 254 sub
>- it will go away with a longer UID field.
Thanks Kevin. Can you suggest any likelihood (yeah--I know--crystal
ball) of this occurring in the near (< 2 months) future? I'm sure such
a change requires issues to be addressed (read: code changes) for the
existing apps. But, if it is at all likely to be soon, then it would
prevent creating a fair amount of (IMO--excessively convoluted) code to
support a "band-aid". Anything that you might comment on that
suggest a timeframe (pros or cons) would be quite beneficial.
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |