[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for VSCP schema
On 8/8/05, Gregg Liming <gregg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From my perspective, just the vscp-class is needed--mostly because
each=
=20
> vscp class defines a functionally distinct set of messages (which
IMO=20
> map well to the notion of a distinct schema). And, VSCP
"handlers"=20
> would be developed incrementally to handle these different classes=20
> (since they map into a totally different set of semantics and
behaviors)=
.
Need to think this over but it sounds OK.
> necessity. Personally, I prefer to run them as a separate process
so=20
> that their operations don't arbitrarily block the application.
Do you see the same problem when and if its run in its own thread
which is how I thought I implement it.
/Ake
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|