[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Port Mapping Questions
- Subject: Re: Port Mapping Questions
- From: John B
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:26:00 +0000
----- Original Message -----
From: Johan Helsingius <<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=p_d_lvq0LM1sbZ5D49Nz5XcZAfW3JsKicqTGL3a29sjCeN6V4CK9Rk6Qq9R_bQyOru70BUemVNA">yahoo@j...</a>>
Sent: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:12:09 +0100
To: <a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=YSyLMpg0LBpop9R8YgKHPO-OTCbVc6L2BGu6qy7CwfiDLenO99lO0YvuWfP-sKJcWT7lLbZMh6EfKnq2RIcUGlWlXbgCqag">xAP_developer@xxxxxxx</a>
Subject: Re: [xAP_developer] Port Mapping Questions
>
> >The trouble is, the "additional port binding" bit is in
the spec, and was
> >already out, and widely in use before I picked up on it. We have
discussed
> >this in the past, and decided to pretty much leave it "as
is" in the
> >interests of stability.
>
> Ummh... But if they are on the same host, you should use *internal*
> sockets anyway ("unix domain sockets" on UNIX/Linux). Or are
> all sockets on Windows always network-visible?
They are always network visible (to my knowledge) however you can just bind
to
the loopback address, effectively making the socket internal to the host.
Regards,
John
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|