[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: X10 xAP Framework plugin - beta testing
- Subject: Re: X10 xAP Framework plugin - beta testing
- From: Mark Harrison \(Yahoo!\)
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:59:00 +0000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Pearson" <<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=Lq3_0oXdm1VgCGYj38n80YKjhksvoDPPlltO6BeRjw14B0cNK5L_UinoUPneN5w8sWCbp060JkeDzN__-JbBjDoQKhq72ArzhQ">edward.mailgroup@b...</a>>
To: <<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=3dQ9QEQ2QlHwHRaMP7L0auppnpNNvdChsqNcsopRnSVHnZmQh3gwAZ1vB6Vv7vaK2mbZyUZqedWu-BK-R_f7knrspD8">xAP_developer@xxxxxxx</a>>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:52 PM
Subject: [xAP_developer] X10 xAP Framework plugin - beta testing
>
> 1) what xAP schema would you need implementing? Right now the
> connector implements a slightly enhanced version of Patrick's schema
> (I think it's backwards compatible) - will that work for you?
I use Patrick's, but it's no big to change. (Indeed - we should just sort
this out and all standardise on one).
>
> 2) do you have any modules that use extended commands? I've written
> the framework to support this but, given the conflicting and unclear
> X10 specifications I have, I've no confidence that it will fly. If
> you have real-life extended command modules (eg, LD10/11) then I'd
> love to see their specs so I can at least check the code by sight.
Alas, no :-(
> 3) do you have addressing constraints? I mean do you care what target
> address the adaptor has (no the most flexible part of the
> implementation currently) - if so, I could wire that in.
Nope.
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|