[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Relays - feedback wanted
- Subject: RE: Relays - feedback wanted
- From: Kevin Hawkins
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 18:47:00 +0000
Ian,
Great stuff - I have been rather busy of late with a load of issues
- but it seems things are coming on well now - I really look forward to
seeing the final product. I will try and provide you some feedback on the
below when I can grab a few mins..
Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian B [mailto:<a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=EngPzUKZ2ezh4KRPMznDlbMUU3i1Bjlcu4_6FLMACI1d1bacdRTCBjIbztVj6-ax6_nrUOptM4PCSzw">Ian@M...</a>]
> Sent: 08 April 2003 00:17
> To: xAP
> Subject: [xAP_developer] Relays - feedback wanted
>
> Hi All
>
> I really need some feedback as all the following is currently working
> and
> about to go into the next stage of development which is the PC
> application
> and PCB production etc.
>
> Here are the commands my relay board will respond to. I have left out
> all
> the extra stuff and just included the class, schema, body and expected
> reply
> if any. At the moment where none is expected I return a reply which
> echoes
> the received message back with a simple status=OK or status=error
> addition.
> I don't expect this to remain in its current form and I am open to
> ideas as
> to what to send back under what circumstances.
>
> Having said this in testing I have seen the need to send a reply of
one
> sort
> or another to all messages. I validate very thoroughly and if there is
> not a
> reply I have no easy way of knowing the result of the command. A
simple
> status message or heartbeat is fine where the change is reflected in
> them
> but this does not cover some things. Examples of this are renaming of
> the
> SubInstances etc. If there was a consistent reply format this could be
> very
> easily parsed for success or otherwise. This is exactly what I am
doing
> in
> the previous paragraph. The reply thing is biased towards my
controller
> and
> possibly other devices on error prone mediums like serial. I am not
> trying
> to push a global standard or anything. Maybe these replies could be
> optional?
>
> My message types and details:
> Here is the first one in full just in case I am using the wrong names
> and
> causing confusion. This is sent from the test application to the relay
> controller
> <STX>xap-header
> {
> v=12
> hop=1
> uid=FF000100
> Class=Inputs.Behaviour
> Source=IansINet.RBControl.AnInstance
> Target=IansINet.RB3_1Controller.Workshop
> }
> Workshop.AnInstance
> {
> Trigger=Rising Edge
> }
> ----<ETX>
>
>
=======================================================================
> =
> Class INPUTS
> Schema BEHAVIOUR
> Body
> Trigger=Rising Edge
> or
> Trigger=Falling Edge
> or
> Trigger=Both Edges
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Class INPUTS
> Schema STATUS
> Body
> none
>
> Reply is the edge trigger being used followed by the input states as
> high or
> low.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Other:
> There is an EVENT which is sent when an input changes state. This
> simply
> states the new state in the body.
>
=======================================================================
> =
> Class RELAYCONTROL
> Schema PREFERENCES
> Body
> Power Recovery=Memory
> Power Recovery=Latched
> Power Recovery=Released
>
> If there is a power failure this is the state the relays will power up
> in
> again.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Class RELAYCONTROL
> Schema PREFERENCES
> Body
> Fitted Relays=4 or 8 (or others I guess but I don't support that)
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Class RELAYCONTROL
> Schema STATUS
> Body
> none
>
> reply is the relay states as ones and zeros followed by the timer
> values for
> all relays e.g.
> status=11001001
> timer1=00:00:15
> etc. etc.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Class RELAYCONTROL
> Schema STATUS
> Body
> Type=Detail
>
> reply is the serial number in hex, number of installed relays and the
> subinstance names.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Class RELAYCONTROL
> Schema COMMAND
> Body
> Command=On
> or
> Command=Off
> or
> Command=Toggle
> or
> Command=DirectSet
> or
> Command=Respond
> or
> Command=Cancel
>
> The first 3 have an optional second line of
> Timer=00:00:00 which sets the countdown timer. This can range between
1
> second and 99 hours, 59 minutes and 59 seconds. If there is an active
> timer
> and these commands are used then the timer is cancelled for ll the
> affected
> relays.
>
> The second line to DirectSet is
> Value=10010101
> where each one and zero represents the desired relay state. There is
no
> timer option here and if this is used all timers are cancelled.
>
> There is no second line to respond which is used to force a heartbeat
> from
> the target devices using wildcarding. Only devices in the target range
> IansINet.RB3_1Controller.* will repond.
>
> Cancel is to cancel a timer as though it has expired. In this case
both
> the
> command and timer body lines have cancel in them. In the future I may
> add
> the ability to customise this behaviour so the relay state may not act
> as if
> the timer has expired and simply stay in the state it is in - user
> choice.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Class XAP-UPDATE
> Schema MASTER
> Body
> UID=xxxx
> or
> Instance=New Instance
> or
> SubInstance=New SubInstance
> or
> Heartbeat=Interval in seconds
> or
> RBSerial Number=New hex serial number, 4 digits. Can only be used
once.
>
=======================================================================
> =
>
> Thanks
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
---------------------~--
> >
> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
> <a href="http://us.click.yahoo.com/xaxhjB/hdqFAA/VygGAA/dpFolB/TM">http://us.click.yahoo.com/xaxhjB/hdqFAA/VygGAA/dpFolB/TM</a>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~-
> >
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> <a
href="/group/xAP_developer/post?postID=c9Ph61CnifENrZ5dRC9ei9TuJcEZhfo42AmowELed2M3SR90HPfrDt4TpfjTx14X9V6O-SJ2Zq8Zrc3CL24JnjSZRIH4IVzm1gkCrRa5bvsi">xAP_developer-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx</a>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a>
xAP_Development Main Index |
xAP_Development Thread Index |
xAP_Development Home |
Archives Home
|