Re: xAP to Squeezebox without Squeezecenter

["rleong1" <reynold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

why not switch to a low bandwidth version of the web interface like
'handheld' or 'light'?  not as pretty but without the tons of javascript
the default interface has.

http://www.doghouselabs.com/system
http://doghouselabs.blogspot.com

--- In xap_automation@xxxxxxx, "Paul Bendall" <paul@...>
wrote:
>
> Thanks Ed and kevin for the replies
>
> --- In xap_automation@xxxxxxx, "Edward Pearson"
<edward.mailgroup@> wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > Why don't you run SC on the mini-ITX but leave all the media
files on the
> > big box? Worth a try. One known downside is that while audio
serving
> > requires little CPU (unless the format requires transcoding)  the
SC web
> > interface does take a fair amount of grunt to make it responsive.
> >
>
> The above is exactly the problem that drove me to put SC on the Big
Box. I first had SC 6.3 on a QNAP NAS device and it worked ok, then SC 6.5
made the web page experience painful. I moved SC to the Mini-ITX server,
but at the point of SC 7.0 the web interface again became to painful and I
moved it on to the Big Box.
>
> Other option I guess is whether I can switch the SB's from the Mini
Box to the Big Box as and when needed?
>
> Paul
>




------------------------------------