[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Squeezebox Duet
------=_Part_69926_611085.1216035742554
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Kevin,
I'm not familiar with xServer, so I don't understand the references to TCP
connections here.
I've built, and run, a cache on my own network - but it's not a very
elegant
solution. Maintaining the state on a distributed basis is a very attractive
solution, and as you point out, it's not necessarily incompatible with
low-end devices, as you generally have to maintain the state of the device
some how anyway.
I see the requirement to simply 'regurgitate' the last message (possibly,
but not necessarily tied to a specific endpoint) as a generic way of
building 'status' capability into all devices without incurring a
significant overhead.
Patrick
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Kevin Hawkins <
yahoogroupskh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> BSC naturally has a query abilty at the individual endpoint level -
such
> that an off device that awoke can immediately synch its state info.
For
> other xAP schema this could be useful although an endpoint might
present
> several different schema or not even use sub addressing.
>
> It's an interesting idea, I wonder if a state/cache application might
be
> appropriate. Just at the moment I'm re-writing the xServer to allow
> for an attaching router client to setup on demand source/class filter
> conditions . Within this there could be a need to provide a small
> buffer for messages, which is a similar feature. This is because the
> client is polling. It maybe that a TCP connection is maintainable -
but
> if not the buffer , or a recover status is needed.
>
> K
>
> Patrick Lidstone wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps this is a good time to chip in with my latest xAP
protocol
> > wheeze - formalising the ability of a device to remember the last
> > message it sent on each endpoint, and providing for a simple
> > retransmission request. This would effectively generalise the
'status'
> > capability to cover any message broadcast from any device by xAP.
> > There are some wrinkles to iron out - but it has promise,
especially
> > when you have 'mostly off' devices in play.
> >
> > P.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Edward Pearson
> > <edward.mailgroup@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:edward.mailgroup@xxxxxxx>>
wrote:
> >
> > Spot on - the controller is a fully fledged computing device
(it
> > runs and embeded Linux) so it's perfectly capable of being an
> > independent xAP controller without SqueezeCenter being in the
> > picture at all. That said, a standalone xAP implementation
would
> > need to deal with it not being always on and indeed ensure
that it
> > didn't require it to be on as that would kill the batteries
very
> > quickly. So maybe a component of the solution does need to be
on
> > the server - hmmm... more thought required on the
architecture.
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx>]
*On Behalf Of *rb_ziggy
> > *Sent:* 13 July 2008 09:29
> >
> > *To:* xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx>
> > *Subject:* [xap_automation] Re: Squeezebox Duet
> >
> > Well, that's fair enough.
> >
> > I was hoping initially that we have a Squeezecenter V7
compatible
> > interface so that an upgrade to a Duet box wouldn't
destroy the
> > underlying ability to xAP interface other units (e.g.
> > Squeezebox 3)
> > when having to install Squeezecentre. This sounds like
exactly
> > what
> > you are aiming for:-)
> >
> > Of course... it does get you thinking that with the
handset, an
> > interface back to xAP could be possible (e.g. menu on the
> > handset -
> > with xAP commands issued from it such as - lights on/off
etc).
> But
> > that is clearly not just functionality in Squeezecentre
> > plugins but
> > something for the handset itself.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > --- In xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>>,
> "Edward Pearson"
> > <edward.mailgroup@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Before you get too excited (and folks' expectations
rise
> > beyond what
> > I can
> > > deliver to) - the version that I'm just finishing up
includes
> no
> > specific
> > > Duet funtionality other than playing well with
SqueezeCenter
> v7.
> > >
> > > Happy to take suggestions on what Duet-specific
fuctionality
> > might
> > include
> > > though...
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > From: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > [mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> >]
> > > On Behalf Of rb_ziggy
> > > Sent: 09 July 2008 22:15
> > > To: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > > Subject: [xap_automation] Re: Squeezebox Duet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > OH NO! That means I'm going to incur another HA
induced bill
> > very
> > > soon to acquire a Duet ;-)
> > >
> > > I'll watch out with interest.
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > --- In xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>, "Edward
Pearson"
> > > <edward.mailgroup@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Working on it right now - fixing defects raised
by beta
> > testers -
> > > probably
> > > > got 2 days more to do on it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _____
> > > >
> > > > From: xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:xap_automation@ <mailto:xap_automation@>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>]
> > > > On Behalf Of rb_ziggy
> > > > Sent: 08 July 2008 20:53
> > > > To: xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [xap_automation] Re: Squeezebox Duet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any news on Slimcentre / Duet progress?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > --- In xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>, "max
barker"
> > <vworpi@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Edward,
> > > > > Any update on the new plugin?
> > > > >
> > > > > Max
> > > > >
> > > > > On 05/02/2008, Edward Pearson
<edward.mailgroup@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes it will.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am working on the v7 (SlimCenter)
plugin right now.
> > Hope to have
> > > > it out
> > > > > > in a week or so.
> > > > > > I'm expecting Logitec to ship me Duet
beta hardware
> > very soon now
> > > > so I'll
> > > > > > be able to test on that hardware.
> > > > > > The initial verison will be a
like-for-like port of
> > the current v6
> > > > plugin.
> > > > > > Then I'll be looking at enhancements
that specifically
> > target
> > > > SlimCenter
> > > > > > features and also the possibilities
of the duet
> > hardware (eg,
> > > > using the
> > > > > > remote for general home control
duties).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > *From:* xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> > > > > > xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>] *On Behalf Of
> > *Kevin Hawkins
> > > > > > *Sent:* 05 February 2008 00:29
> > > > > > *To:* xap_automation@
> > <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com<xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com>
> >>
> > > > yahoogroups.com <http://yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [xap_automation]
Squeezebox Duet
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> > > > > > > The current xAP plugin works in
the current V6
> > SlimServer but
> > > not in
> > > > > > > V7 which Duet will use. I
believe it's quite high on
> > a list of
> > > > > > > things to look at though.... and
fingers crossed the
> > required
> > > > changes
> > > > > > > for V7 will not be too awkward.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kevin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > rb_ziggy wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Does anyone know if the new
Squeezebox Duet
> > will/still supports
> > > > xAP?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I couldn't see a reference
in the specifications on
> the
> > > Slimdevices
> > > > > > >> site.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Looks like a fantastic audio
option and at a price
> that
> > massively
> > > > > > >> undercuts Sonos. If it has
xAP, it could be even more
> > > > interesting as
> > > > > > >> a network controller.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Richard
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
------=_Part_69926_611085.1216035742554
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html><head>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
#ygrp-mkp{
border: 1px solid #d8d8d8;
font-family: Arial;
margin: 14px 0px;
padding: 0px 14px;
}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border: 1px solid #d8d8d8;
}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color: #628c2a;
font-size: 85%;
font-weight: bold;
line-height: 122%;
margin: 10px 0px;
}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding: 0 0;
}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color: #0000ff;
text-decoration: none;
}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body>
Hi Kevin,<br>I'm not familiar with xServer, so I
don't understand the references to TCP connections
here.<br>I've built, and run, a cache on my own network - but
it's not a very elegant solution. Maintaining the state on a
distributed basis is a very attractive solution, and as you point out,
it's not necessarily incompatible with low-end devices, as you
generally have to maintain the state of the device some how
anyway.<br>
I see the requirement to simply 'regurgitate' the last
message (possibly, but not necessarily tied to a specific endpoint) as a
generic way of building 'status' capability into all
devices without incurring a significant overhead.<br>
Patrick<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon,
Jul 14, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Kevin Hawkins <<a href="mailto:yahoogroupskh@xxxxxxx";>yahoogroupskh@xxxxxxx</a>>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
BSC naturally has a query abilty at the individual endpoint level -
such<br>
that an off device that awoke can immediately synch its state info.
For<br>
other xAP schema this could be useful although an endpoint might
present<br>
several different schema or not even use sub
addressing.<br>
<br>
It's an interesting idea, I wonder if a state/cache application
might be<br>
appropriate. Just at the moment I'm re-writing the
xServer to allow<br>
for an attaching router client to setup on demand source/class
filter<br>
conditions . Within this there could be a need to provide a
small<br>
buffer for messages, which is a similar feature. This is because
the<br>
client is polling. It maybe that a TCP connection is maintainable
- but<br>
if not the buffer , or a recover status is needed.<br>
<br>
K<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
Patrick Lidstone wrote:<br>
><br>
> Perhaps this is a good time to chip in with my latest xAP
protocol<br>
> wheeze - formalising the ability of a device to remember the
last<br>
> message it sent on each endpoint, and providing for a
simple<br>
> retransmission request. This would effectively generalise the
'status'<br>
> capability to cover any message broadcast from any device by
xAP.<br>
> There are some wrinkles to iron out - but it has promise,
especially<br>
> when you have 'mostly off' devices in
play.<br>
><br>
> P.<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Edward Pearson<br>
> <<a href="mailto:edward.mailgroup@xxxxxxx";>edward.mailgroup@xxxxxxx</a><br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:edward.mailgroup@xxxxxxx";>edward.mailgroup@xxxxxxx</a>>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Spot on - the controller is a fully fledged
computing device (it<br>
> runs and embeded Linux) so it's
perfectly capable of being an<br>
> independent xAP controller without
SqueezeCenter being in the<br>
> picture at all. That said, a standalone xAP
implementation would<br>
> need to deal with it not being always on and
indeed ensure that it<br>
> didn't require it to be on as that
would kill the batteries very<br>
> quickly. So maybe a component of the
solution does need to be on<br>
> the server - hmmm... more thought required
on the architecture.<br>
><br>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> *From:* <a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a>><br>
> [mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a>>]
*On Behalf Of *rb_ziggy<br>
> *Sent:* 13 July 2008
09:29<br>
><br>
> *To:* <a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a>><br>
</div>> *Subject:*
[xap_automation] Re: Squeezebox Duet<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">><br>
> Well, that's
fair enough.<br>
><br>
> I was hoping initially
that we have a Squeezecenter V7 compatible<br>
> interface so that an
upgrade to a Duet box wouldn't destroy the<br>
> underlying ability to
xAP interface other units (e.g.<br>
> Squeezebox
3)<br>
> when having to install
Squeezecentre. This sounds like exactly<br>
> what<br>
> you are aiming
for:-)<br>
><br>
> Of course... it does
get you thinking that with the handset, an<br>
> interface back to xAP
could be possible (e.g. menu on the<br>
> handset -<br>
> with xAP commands
issued from it such as - lights on/off etc). But<br>
> that is clearly not
just functionality in Squeezecentre<br>
> plugins but<br>
> something for the
handset itself.<br>
><br>
> Regards<br>
><br>
> Richard<br>
><br>
> --- In <a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a>>,
"Edward Pearson"<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
<edward.mailgroup@...> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Before you
get too excited (and folks' expectations rise<br>
> beyond what<br>
> I can<br>
> > deliver to) -
the version that I'm just finishing up includes no<br>
> specific<br>
> > Duet
funtionality other than playing well with SqueezeCenter v7.<br>
> ><br>
> > Happy to take
suggestions on what Duet-specific fuctionality<br>
> might<br>
> include<br>
> >
though...<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> >
_____<br>
> ><br>
> > From: <a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a>><br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a>>]<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
> On Behalf Of rb_ziggy<br>
> > Sent: 09 July
2008 22:15<br>
> > To: <a
href="mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx";>xap_automation@xxxxxxx</a><br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a>><br>
> > Subject:
[xap_automation] Re: Squeezebox Duet<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > OH NO! That
means I'm going to incur another HA induced bill<br>
> very<br>
> > soon to
acquire a Duet ;-)<br>
> ><br>
> > I'll
watch out with interest.<br>
> ><br>
> >
Richard<br>
> ><br>
> > --- In
xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > <a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>>,
"Edward Pearson"<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
> <edward.mailgroup@>
wrote:<br>
> >
><br>
> > >
Working on it right now - fixing defects raised by beta<br>
> testers -<br>
> >
probably<br>
> > > got
2 days more to do on it.<br>
> >
><br>
> >
><br>
> > >
_____<br>
> >
><br>
> > >
From: xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > <a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>><br>
> > [mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation@";>xap_automation@</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation@";>xap_automation@</a>><br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > <a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>>]<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
> > On Behalf Of rb_ziggy<br>
> > >
Sent: 08 July 2008 20:53<br>
> > > To:
xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > <a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>><br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
> > Subject: [xap_automation] Re:
Squeezebox Duet<br>
> >
><br>
> >
><br>
> >
><br>
> > > Any
news on Slimcentre / Duet progress?<br>
> >
><br>
> > >
Cheers<br>
> >
><br>
> > > ---
In xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > >
<a href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>>,
"max barker"<br>
<div><div></div><div
class="Wj3C7c">>
<vworpi@> wrote:<br>
> > >
><br>
> > >
> Edward,<br>
> > >
> Any update on the new plugin?<br>
> > >
><br>
> > >
> Max<br>
> > >
><br>
> > >
> On 05/02/2008, Edward Pearson <edward.mailgroup@>
wrote:<br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> > Yes it will.<br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> > I am working on the v7 (SlimCenter) plugin right
now.<br>
> Hope to have<br>
> > > it
out<br>
> > >
> > in a week or so.<br>
> > >
> > I'm expecting Logitec to ship me Duet beta
hardware<br>
> very soon
now<br>
> > > so
I'll<br>
> > >
> > be able to test on that hardware.<br>
> > >
> > The initial verison will be a like-for-like port
of<br>
> the current
v6<br>
> > >
plugin.<br>
> > >
> > Then I'll be looking at enhancements that
specifically<br>
> target<br>
> > >
SlimCenter<br>
> > >
> > features and also the possibilities of the duet<br>
> hardware
(eg,<br>
> > >
using the<br>
> > >
> > remote for general home control duties).<br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> > ------------------------------<br>
> > >
> > *From:* xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div></div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > >
<a href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>>
[mailto:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
> > > >
xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > >
<a href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>>]
*On Behalf Of<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">>
*Kevin Hawkins<br>
> > >
> > *Sent:* 05 February 2008 00:29<br>
> > >
> > *To:* xap_automation@<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com</a><br>
</div>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:xap_automation%252540yahoogroups.com";>xap_automation%2540yahoogroups.com</a>>><br>
> > >
<a href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">yahoogroups.com</a> <<a
href="http://yahoogroups.com";
target="_blank">http://yahoogroups.com</a>><br>
<div><div></div><div
class="Wj3C7c">>
> > > > *Subject:* Re:
[xap_automation] Squeezebox Duet<br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> > Kevin Hawkins wrote:<br>
> > >
> > > The current xAP plugin works in the current
V6<br>
> SlimServer
but<br>
> > not
in<br>
> > >
> > > V7 which Duet will use. I believe it's
quite high on<br>
> a list of<br>
> > >
> > > things to look at though.... and fingers crossed
the<br>
> required<br>
> > >
changes<br>
> > >
> > > for V7 will not be too awkward.<br>
> > >
> > ><br>
> > >
> > > Kevin<br>
> > >
> > ><br>
> > >
> > > rb_ziggy wrote:<br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> > >> Does anyone know if the new Squeezebox
Duet<br>
> will/still
supports<br>
> > >
xAP?<br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> > >> I couldn't see a reference in
the specifications on the<br>
> >
Slimdevices<br>
> > >
> > >> site.<br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> > >> Looks like a fantastic audio option and
at a price that<br>
> massively<br>
> > >
> > >> undercuts Sonos. If it has xAP, it could
be even more<br>
> > >
interesting as<br>
> > >
> > >> a network controller.<br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> > >> Regards<br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> > >> Richard<br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> > >><br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
> ><br>
> > >
><br>
> >
><br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><div
class="Ih2E3d">------------------------------------<br>
<br>
xAP_Automation Main Index |
xAP_Automation Thread Index |
xAP_Automation Home |
Archives Home
|