Re: xAP on Squeezebox 3

["rb_ziggy" <richard.boreham@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Great news!  I'll look forward to it.

I've just done a test with the SoftSqueeze (as helpfully suggested to
me by someone on list) and with the old conduit it worked fine for
sending on-screen messages. So that's a good start and what I was keen
for in the first instance.

I'll be placing the order for the Squeezebox this afternoon!

Richard

--- In xap_automation@xxxxxxx, "Edward Pearson"
<edward.mailgroup@...> wrote:
>
> Available now! (coding is done, I just need to put it up on my
website...)
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
[mailto:xap_automation@xxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of rb_ziggy
> Sent: 28 October 2006 15:15
> To: xap_automation@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [xap_automation] Re: xAP on Squeezebox 3
>
>
>
> Kevin
>
> Well, I'm not actually running any version of Slimserver yet!
>
> I've got a bit of a lashup streaming solution in the lounge where the
> 'normal' hi-fi sits and the resulting quality is pretty poor. I've
> been hankering over a squeezebox but I'd really like it to work with
> the xAP infrastructure (caller ID etc.)
>
> So it's a pre-purchase question!
>
> It's good to hear that the conduit is under development. Is that a
> REAL soon or 'real' soon? ;-)
>
> regards
>
> Richard
>
> --- In xap_automation@ <mailto:xap_automation%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com, Kevin Hawkins <lists@> wrote:
> >
> > The issue is more to do with the version of SlimServer than the
player.
> > What ver are you running. The conduit works best for pre 6 but
> depending
> > on your display complexities may work for V6. Also there will be
an
> > alternative solution 'real soon now' that will work nicely with
latest
> > SlimServer (6.51).
> >
> > K
> >
> > rb_ziggy wrote:
> > >
> > > COuld anyone let me know if the Slimp plugins work for
displaying on
> > > the the latest Squeezebox 3?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> >
>