The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: FTTP - Draytek Vigor - or Something Else?



I found it extremely simple to get up and running with a basic NAT
gateway - it is always nice to have something that works easily and then
iterate on it.

Because it runs on normal x86 hardware you can also test it out on an
old PC or even run it in VirtualBox before buying hardware. And running
on x86 hardware means there are always other options.


o Router & Firewall handle up to 300 Mbps

I was getting around 800 Mbps from my LAN to DMZ.
And I am able to get the full 200 Mbps out of my Virgin Media
connection.

o Built in VPN

I haven't used it but it supports several different VPN protocols and
hardware acceleration.

o Bandwidth control per IP

I haven't used it but it does have Traffic Shaping support.

o Lots of port forwarding

Yup, there is port-forwarding built into the firewall.

o No command line interfaces (life is too short)

The Web GUI is the default way of configuring it.
It is well designed and reasonably intuitive.


Enough of the sales pitch... I personally would rather be using
something with a text based configuration - keep meaning to give VyOS a
go.


nick.



On 2018-06-13 16:54, lists@xxxxxxx [ukha_d] wrote:
> Thanks Nick.
>
> Whats the learning curve like for pfSense.
>
> M.
>
>
>
> -------------------------
>  Posted by: lists@xxxxxxx
> -------------------------


------------------------------------
Posted by: Nicholas Humfrey <njh@xxxxxxx>
------------------------------------

<*> Join the Automated Home Forums
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/vbulletin/


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.