The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Movie server / large scale file copy



Richcopy isn't a bad tool...

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
keyvan2r
Sent: 06 November 2009 19:03
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Movie server / large scale file copy

Hi all

I have built a large capacity media server running WHS. I am now going
through the painful process of transfering my music, DVD movies and BD
movies from my old 3.6 Tb Terastation Buffalo NAS.
Simple drag and drop copy of the folders from the NAS don't work well due
to
the fact that when I leave the files to copy overnight I come back to find
that at some point the connection was dropped / interupted at some point
and
the operation was terminated. No way of knowing what made it to the server
-
not easily anyway.
My question: is there a smarter / more bullet-proof way of doing this?
Not sure why I loose connection between WHS box and NAS...
I have set them both on fixed IP addresses (in case there is a lease
renewal
during the copy). But that seems not to have fixed it.
So far my best solution is using a free MS utility called SyncToy which
basically sets up a sync between two drives. At least this way when the
connection is lost, it can pick up where it broke and copy what did not
make
it to destination - this might still be unreliable as it only looks at
files
attrib's not content - so if a file is part copied (say a large 44GB BD
iso)
it may think on resync that the file was copied and not repeat the copy.
Any suggestions would be most appreciated.

Thanks



------------------------------------


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.