The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Fw: Re: Cheapest all in one remote for Freesat



Weeeeeeeellll, I just called them on it and the lady said that the
=91old=
=92
price is for the old stock until they last and then the higher price is for
the new stock. Apparently it takes a few hours for the system to reflect
that on the product page.

=20

WTF! What, exactly, takes a few hours? How can they update one price (the
basket price) immediately and the other =93takes a few hours=94.

Throth and bubble!

=20

Best regards,

John Wray

Home Automation

=20

=20

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Geoff H
Sent: 05 June 2009 08:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fw: [ukha_d] Re: Cheapest all in one remote for Freesat

=20






It's a bit naughty to show the price at =A346 on the web page and then=20
change it to =A363 once you add it to your basket.

Geoff

Gareth Cook wrote:
> =A363 now
>=20
>=20
>=20
> One-for-all do a 4 way remote that costs around =A320. I have used one
to=
=20
> control a Humax FreeView box, but it has now been superceded by a=20
> Harmony 555, which I got from Misco for =A346 http://tinyurl.com/olmy8w
>=20
> Although it's more expensive, the harmony is a better choice.
>=20
> Geoff
>=20
> theboyguk5 wrote:
>> 555 might be an option - One seems overkill ?
>>
>> Comfort handles all the macros for AV intelligence.
>>
>> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
, Paul
Gale <groups2@...> wrote:
>>> You could spend a little more and get the stylish Harmony One
for each=
=20
> room (available occasionally for really good prices). That would
easily=20
> deal with all your needs.
>>> Paul.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On Behal=
f
>>>> Of Gareth Cook
>>>> Sent: 03 June 2009 19:40
>>>> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>=20
>>>> Subject: [ukha_d] Cheapest all in one remote for Freesat
>>>>
>>>> After about 13 years, we're ditching Sky. The latest HD
Guide update=20
> is
>>>> playing havoc with the HDMI, and it's slow, cumbersome, a
right royal
>>>> PITA
>>>> to use.
>>>>
>>>> So, going to switch to a Humax HD PVR with Freesat.
>>>>
>>>> I need 4 remotes in total for 4 rooms. Currently 2 of the
Sky remotes
>>>> control the Amp volume. As extra Humax Remotes for this
are =A330, are
>>>> there
>>>> cheap all in one remotes that could do the job that are
more flexible
>>>> ??
>>>>
>>>> tia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and
Wales with
>>>> number
>>>> 741598.
>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
Hampshire PO6
>>>> 3AU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------------------
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number=
=20
> 741598.=20
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3A=
U
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------------------
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.