The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Bargain Home Server PC - Offer Extended


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Fw: Re: HDMI Over CAT5 Gets Affordable


  • Subject: Fw: Re: HDMI Over CAT5 Gets Affordable
  • From: Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:00:03 +0000

I never thought you were making a dig chap .

A cat5 matrix at a reasonable price is what is required from
somewhere....but where ?!



----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 03/01/2008 14:58 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Today 14:53

.
Subject:
.
Fw: [ukha_d] Re: HDMI Over CAT5 Gets Affordable
.
Category:



Gareth,

I wasn't trying to make a dig or upset anyone. I am just trying to
work through the options in my own mind before purchasing equipment.

>From what I have read the ideal soultion would be a HDMI matirx
switch with inbuilt balun for running over Cat5 to the TV in each
room. However, either such a product doesn't exist or would cost
10's thousands of pounds.

So to do it more cheaply I could use a componet matrix switch (they
are cheaper) but still quite expensive.

Or, from what I have read I could use a media centre PC connected to
Sky and stream over the network to a media centre extender?

Paul

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Gareth Cook <g@...> wrote:
>
> You have the AV equipment in the same room as the screen ?
>
> Im struggling to get that in my head....













Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.