The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Best handheld labelling system?



But looking at the price - MM are =A370 more expensive than the
supplier I =
used for the same kit model!!!

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Chris Hunter
> Sent: 29 April 2008 18:27
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Best handheld labelling system?
>=20
> BTW - noticed today that Machine Mart sell a Rhino & some tapes -
> p332 of the catalogue that came today ... wouldn't have thought of
> going to them !
>=20
> Chris
>=20
>=20
> On 29 Apr 2008, at 09:43, Paul Gale wrote:
>=20
> > I'm looking for a replacement handheld labelling system and
wanted
> > some recommendations - needs to be fairly light and print on a
wide
> > range of label types for general unit labelling, wire labelling
> > etc. I did look at the rhino a while back - is this still a good
> > labeller compared to the others out there?
> >
> > Paul
>=20
> ------------------------------------
>=20
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3063 (20080429) __________
>=20
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>=20
> http://www.eset.com
>=20
=20

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signatur=
e database 3064 (20080429) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
=20

------------------------------------


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.