[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [OT] External Hard Disk
I was just *REALLY* surprised having never bothered measuring it (lets
face
it - the server itself has just grown as storage needs expanded) ... I was
expecting 500 watts or more!
I'm in the process of rationalising all my storage over to 1Tb drives so I
would obviously expect that figure to come down quite a lot.
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Rob Iles
> Sent: 01 September 2007 08:53
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] External Hard Disk
>
> oops, sorry - didn't realise you *really* wanted to play a guessing
> game ;)
>
> still - 228 watts peak is, as you say, pretty bloody good!!!!!!!
>
> Cheers,
>
> R.
>
> On 9/1/07, Phil Harris <phil@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping for a few guesses other than Paul's "3
Gigawatts"
> first but
> > yeah I suppose I could do...
> >
> > 224-228 watts whilst all drives spun up and accessing data -
which I
> > thought
> > was pretty bloody good given what it's doing and the sheer number
of
> > drives
> > that are on the thing!
> >
> > (119 watts with the drives spun down but the Mac still running -
the
> Mac
> > itself takes around 35 watts.)
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:
> > ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
> > > Of Rob Iles
> > > Sent: 31 August 2007 22:26
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] External Hard Disk
> > >
> > > Are you going to give us the real figure?
> > >
> > > R
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|