[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Cat-5e
So. If Cat 5e cables are potentially over-spec'd at 350MHz, and only
need to
be "rated" for 125MHz for Gigabit performance what is Cat6 for?
An electrician has just tried to argue that I should flood wire Cat 6
rather
than Cat 5 "because it will be better". Will it?
Pete
_____
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Chris Hunter
Sent: 16 October 2007 17:36
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Cat-5e
Ah, that's better ... now I understand ... I'm glad I stuck with it !
thanks
Chris
On 16 Oct 2007, at 11:36, Mal Lansell wrote:
> --- In ukha_d@yahoogroups. <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
com, Jim
Noble <yahoo-groups@...> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>> 1Gbps != 1000MHz.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
> It runs at 125MHz. Here's some detail:
> http://www.hardware
<http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/231/2>
secrets.com/article/231/2
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|